Skip to content

ENH: We could allow converts to be written in C #68

@seberg

Description

@seberg

I already abstracted conversion away into it C-functions. Right now Python converters are handled slightly differently (but only very slightly, all they have is an additional userdata field holding the python function really).

There is nothing hindering us from making the converters public API. It just needs some definition of how they should be passed. scipy.LowLevelCallable would not be a real option I guess, but basically that, just a notch simpler.

One advantage of adding something like this, is that in case we got more annoying parsing idiosyncrasies, we could "offload" easily deal with them in C, although I don't currently think we would need that.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions