-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
Open
Labels
enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request
Description
Overview
One element which can have impact on the performance is the allocator; in this issue I will show the result of using the following allocators:
Run on the cluster using 4GB of memory.
Results
Overall
Default:
{'ERROR': 13,
'OPTIMAL': 122,
'SATISFIABLE': 233,
'UNKNOWN': 113,
'UNSATISFIABLE': 6}
Jemalloc:
{'ERROR': 19,
'OPTIMAL': 124,
'SATISFIABLE': 226,
'UNKNOWN': 112,
'UNSATISFIABLE': 6}
Mimalloc:
{'ERROR': 16,
'OPTIMAL': 125,
'SATISFIABLE': 227,
'UNKNOWN': 113,
'UNSATISFIABLE': 6}
MiniZinc Scoring
- Default: 359.68
- Jemalloc: 364.62
- Mimalloc: 361.7
Primal Integral
- Default: 28.15
- Jemalloc: 33.63
- Mimalloc: 29.48
Conclusions
Overall, it appears that the default allocator is very reasonable. With both jemalloc and mimalloc, the number of OOM errors increased (from 6 to 12 and 9, respectively). It appears that jemalloc gets a better MiniZinc score, but this is not reflected in the primal integral.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request