You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: writing.Rmd
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Replace them with their referent.
41
41
Do not use them to describe differences between groups or associations, unless you are specifically referring to change over time (e.g., greater language ability was associated with decreases in behavior problems over time).
42
42
Instead, use words such as "higher"/"greater"/"stronger"/"better" and "lower"/"smaller/"weaker"/"poorer", etc.
43
43
1. When writing the Limitations section, provide *thoughtful* limitations.
44
-
As described by [Patrick Curran](https://quantitudepod.org/s2e13-you-want-me-to-do-a-quant-review/), don't include limitation that, if you reversed it, only an ignoramus would endorse it:
44
+
As described by [Patrick Curran](https://quantitudepod.org/s2e13-you-want-me-to-do-a-quant-review/), don't include a limitation that, if you reversed it, only an ignoramus would endorse it:
45
45
> **Curran**: I would love to take credit for this, but a colleague of mine years ago had this great description of, he doesn't want to see a limitation that if you reversed it, only an ignoramus would endorse it.
46
46
> So he said if the limitations were: "*Future research needs to use smaller sample sizes, more homogeneous samples, higher SES*".
47
47
> You reverse the limitation, only an ignoramus would endorse it.
0 commit comments