Multi-tenant Support

[coryodaniel]

Hey there, we're experimenting with this library for SCIM support and was curious if you were open to PRs for multi-tenant support? We're currently solving this with some plugs, a router scope with the tenant ID, and then the process dictionary for the few operations that don't go through mappers.

[wheredoipressnow]

Hello @coryodaniel, yes definitely open to PRs. Multi-tenancy makes sense to properly support.

I would lean toward a design that is tenant-aware but optional - mapper/callback interfaces accept a context that may contain a tenant ID, but single-tenant users can just ignore it.

Happy to discuss further here.

[wheredoipressnow]

Hello again! I went ahead and implemented multi‑tenancy support and opened a PR for it. Just wanted to check whether this aligns with what you had in mind. Happy to adjust anything if needed.