Skip to content

Wallet connection UX: states, errors, and network mismatch #73

@Jagadeeshftw

Description

@Jagadeeshftw

Description

Summary

Within Fluxora-Frontend product design, this task sharpens one user-facing or system-facing visual/UX contract. Fluxora-Frontend is the face of programmable treasury streaming: treasuries, recipients, and auditors infer trust from layout, hierarchy, and feedback—not only from underlying chain correctness. This design task is bounded by its title—Wallet connection UX: states, errors, and network mismatch. Define clear user goals, primary tasks, and success metrics for this slice before pixel work. Deliverables should be reviewable by engineering without guesswork: annotated frames, component specs, and explicit acceptance notes for edge cases. Deferrals must be listed with rationale.

Issue caption: Wallet connection UX: states, errors, and network mismatch

Domain context

Fluxora-Frontend is a treasury- and recipient-facing product: users judge safety and professionalism from
information hierarchy, predictable feedback, and inclusive interaction design. Design work should be shippable—annotated,
state-complete, and aligned with Stellar wallet realities—without forcing engineers to infer missing breakpoints or
accessibility rules.

Work to complete

  1. Produce design intent for Wallet connection UX: states, errors, and network mismatch using the Summary as scope; cover layout, hierarchy, and interaction states.
  2. Specify all relevant states (default, hover/focus, loading, empty, error, success) and how they differ for connected vs anonymous users where applicable.
  3. Capture accessibility expectations: focus order, labels, live regions for async updates, and contrast targets referenced to WCAG intent.
  4. Define handoff artifacts (Figma structure, naming, redlines or dev mode specs) so implementation does not rely on informal chat.

Definition of done

  • Design critique or stakeholder sign-off confirms Wallet connection UX: states, errors, and network mismatch meets treasury/recipient goals without open questions on core flows.
  • Engineering can estimate work from the deliverable without a clarification spike for the documented states.
  • Any intentional exclusions or follow-up bets are listed with owners.

Constraints for contributors

  • Describe outcomes, invariants, and evidence, not a single “right” internal design unless the issue title already names a concrete subsystem.
  • Prefer observable guarantees: state transitions, balances, authorization failures, emitted events, error classifications, and documentation that integrators rely on.
  • If something cannot be tested automatically, capture the gap as audit notes with explicit rationale and residual risk.

Requirements and context

  • Must be inclusive (accessibility considered at design time, not as an afterthought).
  • Should be implementation-ready: engineers can build from frames + notes without inventing missing states.
  • Align with Fluxora-Frontend routes and surfaces (src/pages/, src/components/) conceptually; final file names may differ.

Suggested execution

  1. Branch from the frontend repo:
    git checkout -b design/fluxora-fe-05
  2. Design deliverables
    • Exploration: sketches or low-fi as needed, then hi-fi in Figma (or team-standard tool).
    • Specs: component states, spacing/type tokens references, and copy deck snippets where copy changes.
    • Review: design critique with PM + eng; capture decisions in issue or Figma comments.
  3. Handoff
    • Link Figma / prototype in the closing PR or issue comment.
    • List open questions explicitly if engineering spikes are required.

Guidelines

  • Prototype or redlines for non-obvious interactions (tables, modals, wallet flows).
  • Timeframe: 96 hours

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions