Skip to content

software license clarification #26

@carandraug

Description

@carandraug

The DISCLAIMER.txt file specifies the distribution licence. However, mixed on it is a request to acknowledge CSHL in publications as "scientifically appropriate" which I guess means a reference to a specific paper? Maybe just an acknowledge section on the publication?

Independent of what "scientifically appropriate" means, is this request part of the licence? And if so, is such request compatible with the GPL? (note that the perl licence is artistic or GPL+1). If not, could it be removed? And since DISCLAIMER.txt is actually the licence file, maybe renamed COPYING or LICENSE

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions