Hi @GabrielHoffman!
I have been (further) applying both variancePartition() and dream() to mass spectrometry-based proteomics data and it works quite nicely! Since voom() assumes RNAseq data as input, I tried to provide manually calculated weights to the modelling process. According to the documentation, this should be possible via the weightsMatrix argument. Unfortunately, it does not seem to work for me in either function above - the results are the same with or without providing the weights.
Is this feature not implemented yet or did I maybe misunderstand something? Any help would be highly appreciated!
I took the example from your vignette to reproduce the behaviour:
library("variancePartition")
#> Loading required package: ggplot2
#> Loading required package: limma
#> Loading required package: BiocParallel
#>
#> Attaching package: 'variancePartition'
#> The following objects are masked from 'package:limma':
#>
#> eBayes, topTable
# load simulated data:
# geneExpr: matrix of gene expression values
# info: information/metadata about each sample
data(varPartData)
form <- ~ (1 | Individual) + (1 | Tissue) + Age + Height
# Specify custom weights
# In this example the weights are simulated from a
# uniform distribution and are not meaningful.
weights <- matrix(runif(length(geneExpr)), nrow = nrow(geneExpr))
weights_input <- weights[1:4, ]
# Specify custom weights
res_weights <- fitExtractVarPartModel(geneExpr[1:4, ], form, info,
useWeights = TRUE,
weightsMatrix = weights_input)
res_no_weights <- fitExtractVarPartModel(geneExpr[1:4, ], form, info,
useWeights = FALSE)
identical(res_weights, res_no_weights)
#> [1] TRUE
sessionInfo()
#> R version 4.4.3 (2025-02-28)
#> Platform: aarch64-apple-darwin20
#> Running under: macOS Sequoia 15.7.1
#>
#> Matrix products: default
#> BLAS: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.4-arm64/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib
#> LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/4.4-arm64/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib; LAPACK version 3.12.0
#>
#> locale:
#> [1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
#>
#> time zone: Europe/Stockholm
#> tzcode source: internal
#>
#> attached base packages:
#> [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
#>
#> other attached packages:
#> [1] variancePartition_1.39.4 BiocParallel_1.40.2 limma_3.62.2
#> [4] ggplot2_4.0.0
#>
#> loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
#> [1] tidyselect_1.2.1 dplyr_1.1.4 farver_2.1.2
#> [4] S7_0.2.0 bitops_1.0-9 fastmap_1.2.0
#> [7] reprex_2.1.1 digest_0.6.37 lifecycle_1.0.4
#> [10] statmod_1.5.1 magrittr_2.0.4 compiler_4.4.3
#> [13] rlang_1.1.6 tools_4.4.3 yaml_2.3.10
#> [16] knitr_1.50 plyr_1.8.9 RColorBrewer_1.1-3
#> [19] KernSmooth_2.23-26 withr_3.0.2 purrr_1.1.0
#> [22] numDeriv_2016.8-1.1 BiocGenerics_0.52.0 grid_4.4.3
#> [25] aod_1.3.3 caTools_1.18.3 scales_1.4.0
#> [28] gtools_3.9.5 iterators_1.0.14 MASS_7.3-65
#> [31] cli_3.6.5 mvtnorm_1.3-3 rmarkdown_2.29
#> [34] reformulas_0.4.2 generics_0.1.4 rstudioapi_0.17.1
#> [37] reshape2_1.4.4 minqa_1.2.8 stringr_1.5.2
#> [40] splines_4.4.3 parallel_4.4.3 matrixStats_1.5.0
#> [43] vctrs_0.6.5 boot_1.3-31 Matrix_1.7-3
#> [46] pbkrtest_0.5.5 tidyr_1.3.1 glue_1.8.0
#> [49] nloptr_2.2.1 codetools_0.2-20 stringi_1.8.7
#> [52] gtable_0.3.6 EnvStats_3.1.0 lme4_1.1-37
#> [55] lmerTest_3.1-3 tibble_3.3.0 remaCor_0.0.20
#> [58] pillar_1.11.1 htmltools_0.5.8.1 gplots_3.2.0
#> [61] R6_2.6.1 Rdpack_2.6.4 evaluate_1.0.3
#> [64] lattice_0.22-6 Biobase_2.66.0 rbibutils_2.3
#> [67] backports_1.5.0 RhpcBLASctl_0.23-42 broom_1.0.10
#> [70] fANCOVA_0.6-1 corpcor_1.6.10 Rcpp_1.1.0
#> [73] nlme_3.1-167 xfun_0.51 fs_1.6.6
#> [76] pkgconfig_2.0.3
Created on 2025-11-12 with reprex v2.1.1
Hi @GabrielHoffman!
I have been (further) applying both
variancePartition()anddream()to mass spectrometry-based proteomics data and it works quite nicely! Since voom() assumes RNAseq data as input, I tried to provide manually calculated weights to the modelling process. According to the documentation, this should be possible via theweightsMatrixargument. Unfortunately, it does not seem to work for me in either function above - the results are the same with or without providing the weights.Is this feature not implemented yet or did I maybe misunderstand something? Any help would be highly appreciated!
I took the example from your vignette to reproduce the behaviour:
Created on 2025-11-12 with reprex v2.1.1