We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
您好,想请教下这个项目的性能指标如何? 想了解cnn + full以及mobilenet_v2 + full这两个组合的性能,map以及检测速度两方面。 您可以通过举例在VOC或者COCO上的性能,或者是您自己的数据集上的性能。 希望您能抽空解答下,谢谢!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
没有在VOC或者COCO训练测试过(之前训练了一半,那不稳定的服务器down了,就没再训练下去) 说说在项目上的表现吧,当时项目只是用来检测3-5个目标,比voc或coco的压力小。 在模型大小上,mobilenet约是cnn的1/9. 在检测速率上,两者速率相差不大,没有明显提升。后来寻找了一下原因,https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50385735/why-the-mobilenetv2-is-faster-than-mobilenetv1-only-at-mobile-device 还有一种说法是: 在精度上,mAP持平。但因为我这里检测的目标种类少,且测试集样本树也少,参考意义不大。
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
您好,想请教下这个项目的性能指标如何?
想了解cnn + full以及mobilenet_v2 + full这两个组合的性能,map以及检测速度两方面。
您可以通过举例在VOC或者COCO上的性能,或者是您自己的数据集上的性能。
希望您能抽空解答下,谢谢!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: