AgeWizard bias for densely populated regions of the HR diagram [FEATURE]

[AlexandreLegault]

AgeWizard appears to be bias when yielding a most probable age when the bulk of a population occupies the same bins of a HR diagram, regardless of the contribution of scarcer stars farther along the isocontours. Is there a way to unbias the AgeWizard tool so that it reduces the contribution of overlapping objects?

Inspection of each member's PDF for physical interpretation can do the trick for now, but a weighting system could be interesting!
Thanks!

[HeloiseS]

Thanks for opening this issue. If anyone else is reading up on this as they are using age wizard, here is the current bias that exists:

AgeWizard can misinterpret stars that are on the turn off point as being MS of a lower age population that has MORE stars there.
As a result AgeWizard will tend to OVERESTIMATE the age of a population.

This project is on the back burner but there should be away to apply a scaling to the stars such that this bias is being accounted for.