Skip to content

Mismatch in licensing description (README vs. COPYING) #1

@GrumpyOldTroll

Description

@GrumpyOldTroll

@kaysievers I noticed this in the upstream as well:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kay/libabc.git/

The README indicates this is free and unencumbered, released to the public domain, but COPYING indicates LGPL 2.1. Which one is correct? And can the incorrect one be modified to reflect the current intended license?

Thanks

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions