Is "Works With Both SSR and SPA Applications" a misleading expression?

[Kenzo-Wada]

I noticed the phrase "Works With Both SSR and SPA Applications", and I think it might be confusing.

Strictly speaking, the opposite of SSR (Server-Side Rendering) is CSR (Client-Side Rendering) or sometimes SSG (Static Site Generation).

On the other hand, the opposite of SPA (Single Page Application) is MPA (Multi Page Application).

Since it's possible to have an SPA with SSR (e.g., Next.js running as an SPA but using SSR for initial rendering), the original sentence feels contradictory.

So, the expression "SSR vs. SPA" doesn't sound correct, because they describe orthogonal axes (rendering strategy vs. application type).

👉 Do you agree this wording should be reconsidered? Or is there a specific context where this expression makes sense?