-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
Description
Hi :^)
I really like the ‘gimble query’ function, which gives a very clean summary of the ‘gimble optimize’ outputs.
However, I was wondering how I shall interpret the number of anomaly counts (e.g., does a large number of anomaly counts mean that a model fits badly, despite it shows a high lnCL value compared to the other models?)
Detailed descriptions:
I fitted my data to all five available models in gIMble (DIV, IM_AB, IM_BA, MIG_AB, MIG_BA), and ran them with the code like:
gimble optimize -g CRS2 -e 39 [I change this random seed number for each run] -i 10000
For all IM models (regardless of which dataset I used), they tend to give high anomaly counts (around 5000 anomalies out of 10000) – I feel that cannot be a good thing (?)
Is there any way that I could improve this abnormal behaviour?
Very looking forward to your insightful advice, and many thanks in advance!
Gratefully,
Meng