Skip to content

How to interpret the number of anomaly counts? #122

@MengLu-flw

Description

@MengLu-flw

Hi :^)

I really like the ‘gimble query’ function, which gives a very clean summary of the ‘gimble optimize’ outputs.

However, I was wondering how I shall interpret the number of anomaly counts (e.g., does a large number of anomaly counts mean that a model fits badly, despite it shows a high lnCL value compared to the other models?)

Detailed descriptions:
I fitted my data to all five available models in gIMble (DIV, IM_AB, IM_BA, MIG_AB, MIG_BA), and ran them with the code like:
gimble optimize -g CRS2 -e 39 [I change this random seed number for each run] -i 10000

For all IM models (regardless of which dataset I used), they tend to give high anomaly counts (around 5000 anomalies out of 10000) – I feel that cannot be a good thing (?)

Is there any way that I could improve this abnormal behaviour?

Very looking forward to your insightful advice, and many thanks in advance!

Gratefully,
Meng

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions