Note that this issue requires #566 to be complete first.
During the review of #566, it was suggested (here, here, and here at least, and possibly elsewhere) to remove Path from the group of possible types for items examined by ItemDataDomainDetector objects. This seems like a solid idea but will have some further implications and considerations (e.g., should we do the same for bytes?). As such, that task is receiving this issue of its own.
Note that this issue requires #566 to be complete first.
During the review of #566, it was suggested (here, here, and here at least, and possibly elsewhere) to remove Path from the group of possible types for items examined by ItemDataDomainDetector objects. This seems like a solid idea but will have some further implications and considerations (e.g., should we do the same for
bytes?). As such, that task is receiving this issue of its own.