Now having the distinction between inline and global task references very much improves the way to build-reference smaller tasks inline.
We can now describe a certain feature in within the sentence link to the accomplishing task.
However gaining an overview is still simply done by looking at the margin and see the task-number there.
So I found myself doing both, task:ABC-123[describing the task done inline] while still generating an overview task::ABC-123[].
This feel kind of double-work for the same task. What would improve the situation? I suggest to insert a simple option character to have both:
- existing
task::ABC-123[] renders right ABC-123
- existing
task::ABC-123[describing the task done inline] renders right describing the task done inline
- existing
task:ABC-123[] renders inline ABC-123
- existing
task:+ABC-123[describing the task done inline] renders inline describing the task done inline
- proposal
task:+ABC-123[describing the task done inline] renders inline describing the task done inline AND right ABC-123
- proposal
task:*ABC-123[describing the task done inline] renders inline describing the task done inline AND right describing the task done inline
I'm open for other suggestions to avoid double-specification of tasks
Now having the distinction between inline and global task references very much improves the way to build-reference smaller tasks inline.
We can now describe a certain feature in within the sentence link to the accomplishing task.
However gaining an overview is still simply done by looking at the margin and see the task-number there.
So I found myself doing both,
task:ABC-123[describing the task done inline]while still generating an overviewtask::ABC-123[].This feel kind of double-work for the same task. What would improve the situation? I suggest to insert a simple option character to have both:
task::ABC-123[]renders right ABC-123task::ABC-123[describing the task done inline]renders right describing the task done inlinetask:ABC-123[]renders inline ABC-123task:+ABC-123[describing the task done inline]renders inline describing the task done inlinetask:+ABC-123[describing the task done inline]renders inline describing the task done inline AND right ABC-123task:*ABC-123[describing the task done inline]renders inline describing the task done inline AND right describing the task done inlineI'm open for other suggestions to avoid double-specification of tasks