Skip to content

[question]: A capacitor-only plugin? #1050

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
1 task done
jpike88 opened this issue Apr 22, 2025 · 1 comment
Open
1 task done

[question]: A capacitor-only plugin? #1050

jpike88 opened this issue Apr 22, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@jpike88
Copy link

jpike88 commented Apr 22, 2025

How can we help?

It's frustrating to be held back by this library from just going 100% capacitor. Is there any appetite for a capacitor only version of this SDK?

Considering how this lib really just a wrapper, seems like it wouldn't be a huge deal to do. Thoughts?

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
@ctg3
Copy link

ctg3 commented Apr 25, 2025

I would appreciate this as well!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants