Skip to content

Conversation

@blakesweeney
Copy link
Member

This does several things:

  • Move accession column out of rnc_sequence_features, to work better with storing Rfam hits and corrects the representation of the features.

  • Rename rnc_sequence_features_id to rnc_sequence_feature_id. That name is weird and reads wrong

  • Rename start/stop to start_index/stop_index. I think we should start using something like _index or some other term to indicate that this is a zero based field

  • Renames the column upi to urs. We should use this id every where and this is just one step to that.

It's worth discussing if these are good ideas for our database.

This does several things:

- Move accession column out of rnc_sequence_features, to work better
  with storing Rfam hits and corrects the representation of the
  features.
- Rename rnc_sequence_features_id to rnc_sequence_feature_id. That name
  is weird and reads wrong

- Rename start/stop to start_index/stop_index. I think we should start
  using something like _index or some other term to indicate that this
  is a zero based field

- Renames the column upi to urs. We should use this id every where and
  this is just one step to that.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants