Skip to content

Version of zbackup in this repo is not safe #22

@tesujimath

Description

@tesujimath

I'm the author of zbackup, which is in use here on 5 production fileservers replicating 100s of TB of data. Rather than implement it in my own repo, seperate from zfs-tools, I decided to contribute it to the zfs-tools repo, mainly because of the close integration with the underlying scripts and library. In hindsight, that may have been a mistake.

I submitted a pull request for an enhancement I made to zbackup in September 2014 in my repo. This was not accepted, but in my view is essential if zbackup is to be used safely in a large-scale environment.

So, for now I recommend that any serious users of zbackup use my original version.

I see another issue (#18) has been raised about zbackup functionality, but the author of this repo is not able to respond meaningfully because he is not the author of zbackup itself.

I am therefore wondering whether zbackup should now be decoupled from the underlying zfs-tools, so that proper maintenance may be performed by the original author, without getting bogged down in inconsequential disagreements (like the location of the lock directory).

What do you think?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions