Skip to content

[pomoxis] Reticulatus-pomoxis tracking issue #42

@SamStudio8

Description

@SamStudio8

Reticulatus ships with a particular version of pomoxis to provide a hacked version of the subsample_bam that runs most fast. This is a tracking issue to keep tabs on it.

  • Make it work properly (recently experiments have shown it doesnt actually work which is not ideal)
  • Add some randomness to the track-filling approach by keeping a list of N reads that start within the end of the emptiest track
  • Raise an error if the coverage subsetting fails to yield coverage +/- some epsilon from the target

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

dont worrythings that you probably don't need to worry about (yet)enhancementthings to make the snakes harder, better, faster and or stronger

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions