Skip to content

The implementation in paper is different from a paper. #24

@Ho1guma

Description

@Ho1guma

At first, thank you for a innovative paper.

I read that you "mix the two image pairs" before this pair goes to encoder(Swin Transformer).

However, there is only one image in processing part and loss part.

Code does not match with the paper.

And I trained the code with 8 GPUs and 128 batch size applying 2 accum_iteration, it did not reproduce to performance in the paper.

Is the code is not latest version?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions