Skip to content

Reproducing results in paper #28

@bkj

Description

@bkj

I'm trying to reproduce the results of Table 2 in the paper. I ran the code in the repo on the TRANCOS dataset and got the following results after 1000 epochs:

validation_mae = 3.80
test_mae = 3.55

The paper reports a test MAE of 3.32. Is the difference of 0.2 MAE reasonable given different seeds, different initialization, etc?

And/or is there some way to seed the code so it gets 3.32 precisely?

Thanks!

Edit: Looking at the output some more, I see that the best valid MAE was 3.36 after 902 epochs. Are the numbers in Table 2 reporting validation or test performance?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions