I knew the subject-specific tractography data is transformed into the atlas space and then perform clustering. So I wonder if the output clustering results are in the atlas space?
If so. How can we transform it back into subject-specific space for further analysis?
We use SupWMA on HCP 7T data and merge all 198 clusters into one file. The result looks good in 3DSlicer 👍👍 but then we transform vtp file to tck file and loaded in MRview. The tractogram is not aligned with the subject-specific b0_mean.


If the 'Tractograpy Display' modules in 3dslicer would coregister tractogram with image automatically? However, they are not actually in the same space?
Thank you!
I knew the subject-specific tractography data is transformed into the atlas space and then perform clustering. So I wonder if the output clustering results are in the atlas space?
If so. How can we transform it back into subject-specific space for further analysis?
We use SupWMA on HCP 7T data and merge all 198 clusters into one file. The result looks good in 3DSlicer 👍👍 but then we transform vtp file to tck file and loaded in MRview. The tractogram is not aligned with the subject-specific b0_mean.
If the 'Tractograpy Display' modules in 3dslicer would coregister tractogram with image automatically? However, they are not actually in the same space?
Thank you!