I'd actually like to bring the execute implementation into the packets and remove the getCommand and setCommand. Possibly looking at either class storage OR (preferably) a command indexing system or alternatively a channel per packet type and then packetIds being the 'commands'.
Right now I think that the abstraction is great, however I think we may be able to simplify things. I'll have to look deeper into it.
I'd actually like to bring the execute implementation into the packets and remove the getCommand and setCommand. Possibly looking at either class storage OR (preferably) a command indexing system or alternatively a channel per packet type and then packetIds being the 'commands'.
Right now I think that the abstraction is great, however I think we may be able to simplify things. I'll have to look deeper into it.