Skip to content

Reproducibility gap #5

@escorciav

Description

@escorciav

I managed to reproduce all the testing/inference results. My results are below:

There is a discrepancy of 0.1%, 15.48% v.s. 15.6% claimed in the README. That looks reasonable to me. Could you please confirm so?

Namespace(gt_file='../../../../preprocess/caption_gt_test.json', pred_file='../sim_iter_5000.p', recall=[1, 5, 10], tiou=[0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7])

tiou@0.1 :  [1, 5, 10]
0.639247311828
0.99247311828
0.99623655914

tiou@0.3 :  [1, 5, 10]
0.513709677419
0.948924731183
0.989784946237

tiou@0.5 :  [1, 5, 10]
0.337096774194
0.764784946237
0.922043010753

tiou@0.7 :  [1, 5, 10]
0.154838709677
0.447043010753
0.618279569892

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions