From da0e4da10f5e4ee0eea9e2baa8ec48c177ca4296 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adarsh Pyarelal Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 09:37:19 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo in acguidelines.md --- acguidelines.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/acguidelines.md b/acguidelines.md index 00c464ac7..4d2585143 100644 --- a/acguidelines.md +++ b/acguidelines.md @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ You need to perform the following checks and tasks:
- [ ] Each paper has to have **exactly three reviewers** assigned. Please, at this initial stage, do not assign more than three reviewers to a paper! In large cycles, we are at the limit of our reviewing capacity and we cannot afford to waste reviewers effort. You can easily check for this by going to your 'Assigned submissions' list, and entering `+numReviewersAssigned>3` in the search field. -- [ ] **Reviewers should be assigned more papers than their maximum load. Please help us maintain this limit.** You can check this by going to "modify reviewer assignments interface". Clicking on each paper should bring up the list of assigned reviewers, and for each reviewer you should be able to see their "max papers" and "assignments". If you see any reviewer whose current number of assignments is bigger than the "max papers", please find replacement reviewers who are still under their maximum load within OR. There is a checkbox that implements that filter, as shown in the screenshot above. +- [ ] **Reviewers should not be assigned more papers than their maximum load. Please help us maintain this limit.** You can check this by going to "modify reviewer assignments interface". Clicking on each paper should bring up the list of assigned reviewers, and for each reviewer you should be able to see their "max papers" and "assignments". If you see any reviewer whose current number of assignments is bigger than the "max papers", please find replacement reviewers who are still under their maximum load within OR. There is a checkbox that implements that filter, as shown in the screenshot above. - [ ] At least one (ideally two) of the reviewers is past the postgraduate degree stage. Check the Seniority flag, if it’s set to 1, it should mean the reviewer is not a student (there was a bug in the past where this was set incorrectly for some profiles, it should be fixed now). Instructions for interpreting affinity scores are [here](#how-to-interpret-reviewer-affinity-scores). - [ ] The assigned reviewers should also be diverse in terms of affiliation and geography. The above interface for reviewer assignments shows affiliations of reviewers to help you assess that. - [ ] Check that **resubmissions are handled appropriately**. Instructions [here](#how-to-check-reviewing-assignments-for-resubmissions). @@ -470,4 +470,4 @@ As of January 12, 2024, the ACL has adopted a new policy on preprints. Please re - _01.05.2024_ Update on the new ACL review incentives policies. - _21.10.2024_ A major update by Anna Rogers, based on internal ARR documentation and updated [reviewer guidelines](reviewerguidelines). Input from Michael White, Viviane Moreira, Marzena Karpinska. -- The first version of this document was authored with input from Goran Glavaš, Nathan Schneider, Amanda Stent and the ACL 2022 program chairs. \ No newline at end of file +- The first version of this document was authored with input from Goran Glavaš, Nathan Schneider, Amanda Stent and the ACL 2022 program chairs.