Problem
The statusline's `⚠ N need-you` counts only items explicitly labeled `breeze:human` on GitHub. That's the right signal for escalated work, but it hides the everyday "someone expects a response from me" signal: direct @mentions, PRs awaiting my review, issue assignments.
Today I see `⚠ 0 need-you · 93 PRs · 87 issues` while 10 items actually require my reply, because none were escalated via `breeze:human`. The `/breeze` skill's "🔴 Needs you" section surfaces them via a mention/review-request filter — the statusline should reflect the same idea in summary form.
Proposed
Add a `👤 N @you` segment between `⚠ need-you` and the type counts:
```
/breeze: ⚠ 2 need-you · 👤 10 @you · 93 PRs · 87 issues · 2 discussions
```
`@you` = notifications where `breeze_status == "new"` AND reason in `{mention, review_requested, assign}`.
Hidden when zero, same as the `⚠ need-you` part.
Why two numbers
- `⚠ need-you` — rare + urgent (agent escalated, truly blocking). Keep the warning styling.
- `👤 @you` — common + actionable (someone asked me something). Informational but not alarming.
One number can't carry both signals.
Problem
The statusline's `⚠ N need-you` counts only items explicitly labeled `breeze:human` on GitHub. That's the right signal for escalated work, but it hides the everyday "someone expects a response from me" signal: direct @mentions, PRs awaiting my review, issue assignments.
Today I see `⚠ 0 need-you · 93 PRs · 87 issues` while 10 items actually require my reply, because none were escalated via `breeze:human`. The `/breeze` skill's "🔴 Needs you" section surfaces them via a mention/review-request filter — the statusline should reflect the same idea in summary form.
Proposed
Add a `👤 N @you` segment between `⚠ need-you` and the type counts:
```
/breeze: ⚠ 2 need-you · 👤 10 @you · 93 PRs · 87 issues · 2 discussions
```
`@you` = notifications where `breeze_status == "new"` AND reason in `{mention, review_requested, assign}`.
Hidden when zero, same as the `⚠ need-you` part.
Why two numbers
One number can't carry both signals.