Skip to content

Even got better results? How? #7

@breadacker

Description

@breadacker

I had tried running FreTS model on ETTm1 and ETTh1 datasets with both univariate and multivariate forecasting tasks. The following results are even better than the results mentioned in your article. How is that possible?

---Hyperparameters---
Used MS or S for features
Used freq as detailed like 1min rathen than t as minutely
Used other settings as default given by you

---GPU--
RTX 3060 6GB

Univariate ETTh1 Test Results
mse:0.002602622378617525, mae:0.03822975605726242, rmse:0.05101590231060982

Multivariate ETTh1 Test Results
mse:0.002601700136438012, mae:0.038223933428525925, rmse:0.05100686475634575

Univariate ETTm1 Test Results
mse:0.0011898829834535718, mae:0.025772279128432274, rmse:0.03449467942118645

Multivariate ETTm1 Test Results
mse:0.0012134966673329473, mae:0.026144789531826973, rmse:0.03483527898788452

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions