diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index acfe2dc66..6ac10c044 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ wheelhouse/
 
 # AI artifacts
 CLAUDE.local.md
-.claude/settings.local.json
+.claude/
 AGENTS.md
 .tasks/
 .opencode/
diff --git a/docs/book/decisions/0001-package-naming-strategy.md b/docs/book/decisions/0001-package-naming-strategy.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c3758af99
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/book/decisions/0001-package-naming-strategy.md
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+---
+status: proposed
+date: 2025-08-20
+decision-makers: Bruno Martins, Larkin Young, Joe Polny, David Rojas
+consulted: [TBD]
+---
+
+# Package Naming Strategy for Multi-Language AlgoKit Libraries
+
+## Context and Problem Statement
+
+The AlgoKit ecosystem currently includes utilities libraries named `algokit-utils-ts` and `algokit-utils-py` for TypeScript and Python respectively. As we expand to support additional languages (Go, Kotlin, Swift, and Rust) and evolve these libraries into more comprehensive SDKs, we need to establish a consistent naming strategy.
+
+The current "utils" naming was adopted due to naming conflicts with `algosdk` packages published by Algorand Technologies. However, these libraries have evolved beyond simple utilities and now provide comprehensive SDK functionality for Algorand development.
+
+## Decision Drivers
+
+- Clear and consistent naming across all target languages
+- Reflect the true nature of these libraries as SDKs rather than utility collections
+- Avoid naming conflicts with existing Algorand packages
+- Follow language-specific naming conventions
+- Enable easy discovery and understanding of package purpose
+
+## Target Languages
+
+- TypeScript (ts)
+- Python (py) 
+- Go (go)
+- Kotlin (kt)
+- Swift (swift)
+- Rust (rs)
+
+## Considered Options
+
+### 1. Keep current naming: `algokit-utils-{lang}`
+
+Continue using the existing naming pattern:
+- `algokit-utils-ts` (TypeScript)
+- `algokit-utils-py` (Python)
+- `algokit-utils-go` (Go)
+- `algokit-utils-kt` (Kotlin)
+- `algokit-utils-swift` (Swift)
+- `algokit-utils-rs` (Rust)
+
+**Pros:**
+- No breaking changes required
+- Existing users familiar with naming
+- No migration effort needed
+
+**Cons:**
+- Misrepresents the true nature of these comprehensive SDKs
+- "Utils" implies limited utility functions rather than full SDK capabilities
+- Inconsistent with the evolving AlgoKit ecosystem strategy
+
+### 2. Adopt SDK naming: `algokit-sdk-{lang}`
+
+Use SDK naming to reflect the true nature of these libraries:
+- `algokit-sdk-ts` (TypeScript)
+- `algokit-sdk-py` (Python)
+- `algokit-sdk-go` (Go)
+- `algokit-sdk-kt` (Kotlin)
+- `algokit-sdk-swift` (Swift)
+- `algokit-sdk-rs` (Rust)
+
+**Language-specific adaptations:**
+- **TypeScript/JavaScript**: `@algorandfoundation/algokit-sdk-ts` (scoped package)
+- **Python**: `algokit_sdk_py` (snake_case following PEP conventions)
+- **Swift**: `AlgoKitSDKSwift` (PascalCase following Swift conventions)
+- **Kotlin**: `algokit-sdk-kt` (kebab-case following Kotlin/Java conventions)
+- **Go**: `algokit-sdk-go` (kebab-case for module names)
+- **Rust**: `algokit_sdk_rs` (snake_case following Rust conventions)
+
+**Pros:**
+- Accurately reflects comprehensive SDK functionality
+- Clear indication of purpose for developers
+- Consistent naming strategy across all languages
+- Better discoverability and understanding
+- Avoids conflicts with existing algosdk packages
+- Follows established conventions in each language ecosystem
+
+**Cons:**
+- Breaking change requiring migration from existing packages
+- Requires documentation updates and migration guides
+- Temporary confusion during transition period
+- Migration coordination needed with major version releases
+
+### 3. Use AlgoKit branding: `algokit-{lang}`
+
+Simplified naming without SDK/utils designation:
+- `algokit-ts` (TypeScript)
+- `algokit-py` (Python)
+- `algokit-go` (Go)
+- `algokit-kt` (Kotlin)
+- `algokit-swift` (Swift)
+- `algokit-rs` (Rust)
+
+**Pros:**
+- Clean, simple naming
+- Strong AlgoKit brand association
+- Language designation still clear
+
+**Cons:**
+- Doesn't indicate the nature of the package (SDK vs CLI vs other tools)
+- Potential confusion with other AlgoKit packages
+- Less descriptive than SDK naming
+- May conflict with future AlgoKit packages
+
+## Decision Outcome
+
+_TO BE DECIDED_
diff --git a/docs/book/decisions/README.md b/docs/book/decisions/README.md
index efc53f041..04863a40a 100644
--- a/docs/book/decisions/README.md
+++ b/docs/book/decisions/README.md
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ This section contains Architecture Decision Records documenting important decisi
 ## Contents
 
 - **[0000: Native Implementations vs FFI](./0000-native-implementations-vs-ffi.md)** - Decision on implementation strategy for multi-language support
+- **[0001: Package Naming Strategy](./0001-package-naming-strategy.md)** - Decision on naming convention for multi-language AlgoKit libraries
 
 ## ADR Format