As part of the effort to consolidate U-Boot forks at ADI, u-boot-xlnx should be deprecated.
Initially the commits will be copied to a corresponding adi-xlnx-u-boot-<year>.<xilinx-ver>-y branch. Then ideally they would be forward ported to a newer release so we don't need to maintain so many branches.
Branches to be migrated
master (xilinx-2018.2)
pluto (xilinx-v2016.4) 61 commits
jupiter-sdr (xilinx-v2023.1) 3 commits
adi_k26_smk_dts_wrapper (xilinx-v2023.2) 1 commit
Related tasks
As part of the effort to consolidate U-Boot forks at ADI, u-boot-xlnx should be deprecated.
Initially the commits will be copied to a corresponding
adi-xlnx-u-boot-<year>.<xilinx-ver>-ybranch. Then ideally they would be forward ported to a newer release so we don't need to maintain so many branches.Branches to be migrated
master(xilinx-2018.2)adi-xlnx-u-boot-2018.2.yadi-xlnx-u-boot-2025.1-ypluto(xilinx-v2016.4) 61 commitsjupiter-sdr(xilinx-v2023.1) 3 commitsadi_k26_smk_dts_wrapper(xilinx-v2023.2) 1 commitOnly includes a dts snippet, which enables a sdhci and includes another dts that only disables the same node. So the user of this dts can simply use the original dts where sdhci is already enabled. @SRaus do you know who is using this branch and why we can't just use the original dts, which wouldn't require a patch?adi-2025.10.yRelated tasks
cibranch and make it the default