Hello! I have been attempting to run this code for a couple of weeks but seem to have hit a dead end.
I am running the model on Ubuntu 18.04, with Tensorflow GPU installed (and verified with other code) and with CUDA 10.0 and CuDNN 7.6.1.
My end goal is to use CASP12 to predict the structure of around 1000 proteins.
At the moment I am using CASP10 (to save space) and trying to predict the structure of just one sequence to test the model.
Here is my folder structure:
WD/hmmer-3.2.1
WD/rgn/data_processing/
WD/rgn/model/
WD/proteinnet10
WD/RGN10/data/ProteinNet10Thinning90/testing
WD/RGN10/data/ProteinNet10Thinning90/training
WD/RGN10/data/ProteinNet10Thinning90/validation
WD/RGN10/runs/CASP10/ProteinNet10Thinning90/1
WD/RGN10/runs/CASP10/ProteinNet10Thinning90/2
...
WD/RGN10/runs/CASP10/ProteinNet10Thinning90/logs
WD/RGN10/runs/CASP10/ProteinNet10Thinning90/checkpoints
WD/RGN10/runs/CASP10/ProteinNet10Thinning90/configuration
WD/RGN10/logs
This is the last line of code:
rgn/model/protling.py RGN10/runs/CASP10/ProteinNet10Thinning90/configuration -d RGN10 -p -e weighted_testing
When the model runs there doesn't appear to be any errors, however the prediction is placed in folder number 1 and not in the highest number folder as would be expected.
Following the comments in another issue, I have tried deleting all the numbered folders and just training the model using the following code:
rgn/model/protling.py RGN10/runs/CASP10/ProteinNet10Thinning90/configuration -d RGN10
This only creates folder 1, logs, and checkpoints folders.
Likewise for the following code:
rgn/model/protling.py RGN10/runs/CASP10/ProteinNet10Thinning90/configuration -d RGN10 -p -e weighted_testing
Where once again only folder 1, logs, and checkpoints folders are created and the prediction for our sequence is placed in folder 1.
We have looked at this prediction and have converted it to a PDB file to view in PyMol, however the output is a helical structure (completely different to what a folded protein would look like).
We would appreciate any suggestions you have about how to fix this issue.
Hello! I have been attempting to run this code for a couple of weeks but seem to have hit a dead end.
I am running the model on Ubuntu 18.04, with Tensorflow GPU installed (and verified with other code) and with CUDA 10.0 and CuDNN 7.6.1.
My end goal is to use CASP12 to predict the structure of around 1000 proteins.
At the moment I am using CASP10 (to save space) and trying to predict the structure of just one sequence to test the model.
Here is my folder structure:
WD/hmmer-3.2.1
WD/rgn/data_processing/
WD/rgn/model/
WD/proteinnet10
WD/RGN10/data/ProteinNet10Thinning90/testing
WD/RGN10/data/ProteinNet10Thinning90/training
WD/RGN10/data/ProteinNet10Thinning90/validation
WD/RGN10/runs/CASP10/ProteinNet10Thinning90/1
WD/RGN10/runs/CASP10/ProteinNet10Thinning90/2
...
WD/RGN10/runs/CASP10/ProteinNet10Thinning90/logs
WD/RGN10/runs/CASP10/ProteinNet10Thinning90/checkpoints
WD/RGN10/runs/CASP10/ProteinNet10Thinning90/configuration
WD/RGN10/logs
This is the last line of code:
rgn/model/protling.py RGN10/runs/CASP10/ProteinNet10Thinning90/configuration -d RGN10 -p -e weighted_testingWhen the model runs there doesn't appear to be any errors, however the prediction is placed in folder number 1 and not in the highest number folder as would be expected.
Following the comments in another issue, I have tried deleting all the numbered folders and just training the model using the following code:
rgn/model/protling.py RGN10/runs/CASP10/ProteinNet10Thinning90/configuration -d RGN10This only creates folder 1, logs, and checkpoints folders.
Likewise for the following code:
rgn/model/protling.py RGN10/runs/CASP10/ProteinNet10Thinning90/configuration -d RGN10 -p -e weighted_testingWhere once again only folder 1, logs, and checkpoints folders are created and the prediction for our sequence is placed in folder 1.
We have looked at this prediction and have converted it to a PDB file to view in PyMol, however the output is a helical structure (completely different to what a folded protein would look like).
We would appreciate any suggestions you have about how to fix this issue.