Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

parent directory

..
 
 

README.md

Coverage

This directory contains coverage-tracking artifacts used to measure, visualize, and prioritize detection engineering progress.

Purpose

Coverage tracking helps the program understand:

  • which attacker behaviors are represented in current content
  • where meaningful detection gaps remain
  • which tactics or techniques need additional engineering focus
  • how detection engineering maturity is progressing over time

Coverage is intended to support both engineering decision-making and leadership reporting.

Coverage Areas

MITRE ATT&CK

Used for:

  • ATT&CK coverage matrices
  • coverage summaries
  • documented gaps
  • gap closure tracking

Cyber Kill Chain

Used for:

  • CKC-aligned coverage views
  • supporting summaries
  • visual or matrix-based reporting where applicable

Typical Artifacts

Examples of artifacts in this directory may include:

  • coverage matrix CSV files
  • coverage summary markdown files
  • gap tracking documents
  • supporting charts or exported visuals
  • tactic and technique mapping support files

How Coverage Should Be Used

Coverage artifacts should help answer questions such as:

  • which ATT&CK tactics have the strongest current support?
  • which tactics or techniques are underrepresented?
  • which gaps are blocked by telemetry rather than engineering effort?
  • which areas should be prioritized in the roadmap?
  • how is coverage changing over time?

Coverage Principles

Coverage tracking should be:

Useful

It should support decision-making, not just exist as a count of mapped rules.

Structured

Artifacts should be maintained in predictable folders and formats.

Honest

Coverage should not overstate maturity or depth simply because a tactic has one starter rule.

Aligned

Coverage should connect back to roadmap priorities, telemetry reality, and program maturity.

Reportable

Artifacts should be usable in quarterly reviews, annual reviews, and executive updates.

Related Content

Recommended Review Rhythm

Coverage artifacts should be reviewed:

  • periodically during content expansion
  • during quarterly reporting cycles
  • during annual roadmap review
  • whenever significant new detections are added
  • whenever major telemetry changes affect use case feasibility

Goal

The goal of this directory is to make detection coverage visible, actionable, and measurable so the program can mature deliberately rather than grow without direction.