Unclear how to resolve a requestInfoReplyComment for instance in the case of a verbose title and no body

[dpritchett]

[request-info]

We would appreciate it if you could provide us with more info about this issue/pr!

[welcome]

Thanks for opening this issue, a maintainer will get back to you shortly!

[dpritchett]

Reproduction instructions:

[dpritchett]

I've been brainstorming on how/where whether to add the extra info (which right now is "have a not-empty Body field and an acceptable title" in such a way that the issue opener knows exactly what to do to appease the bot.

In my case, I went and read the source code. That's cool, but I think we can do better!

I really wanted to come here with a PR instead of just an issue, but I'm not there yet and I wanted to give a heads up.

Thanks for this cool project!
Daniel

[hiimbex]

Thanks for this issue and sorry for the delay in response! PRs are totally welcome! I think this bot could certainly be expanded on and improved in numerous ways :)

[rsarky]

@dpritchett Would changing the welcome bot's response to something like

We would appreciate it if you could provide us with more info about this issue/pr!
⚠️ The body of the issue/PR should not be empty.

whenever the body is empty be helpful?

[dpritchett]

Yes I think that would be great! As long as the user immediately knows how to resolve the rejection it's perfect :)

…

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Rohit Sarkar ***@***.***> wrote: @dpritchett <https://github.com/dpritchett> Would changing the welcome bot's response to something like We would appreciate it if you could provide us with more info about this issue/pr! ⚠️ The body of the issue/PR should not be empty. whenever the body is empty be helpful? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#29 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJCDc7C6-azpLQMwRfFahT_OZHC03gTks5tpO8igaJpZM4R2EUu> .

[rsarky]

cc : @hiimbex