Skip to content

1948 ENIAC #3

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
dbrll opened this issue Feb 10, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

1948 ENIAC #3

dbrll opened this issue Feb 10, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@dbrll
Copy link

dbrll commented Feb 10, 2022

Hi,

From the README:

Future plans include implementing the enhancements that were made at the Ballistics Research Lab during its operational life.

I assume this means implementing the 1948 "Von Neuman" ENIAC? Are there any wiring diagrams available for this re-implementation, and specifications for the new converter unit?
The ENIAC was a stored program computer for most of its 11 years life, yet it's mostly only remembered as it was in its early days. Emulating its 1948 implementation and maybe its later additions such as core memory would be a first, and would bring historical recognition to this machine which ran its first stored program one month before the SSEM. I'm definitely looking forward to seeing this.

By the way, since the simulator goes down to the pulse level, may we also assume it would be feasible to display a view of the Cycling Unit oscilloscope, and enjoy watching the pulses traveling through the machine? I believe this would be another first in a low level emulator.

@dbrll
Copy link
Author

dbrll commented Feb 10, 2022

Addendum: I probably didn't spend enough time researching the topic before posting this enhancement suggestion. The 1948 configuration has been indeed documented, and I read Mark Priestley developed an emulator for it, although I'm not quite sure it was made publicly available.
I wasn't aware of this until I read your "Simulating the ENIAC" article more thoroughly.

@blstuart
Copy link
Owner

blstuart commented Feb 17, 2022 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants