Skip to content

Changes for 2.0 #196

@coretl

Description

@coretl

A draft issue for now, but jotting down the requirements that we have for scanspec 2.0

  • We need to be able to get the scan path at the servo rate rather than the detector exposure rate
  • We need to add detector triggering information into the scanspec so we can put gaps between the triggers where the velocity is still constrained
  • We might want to lift the turnaround code up into scanspec (using ruckig or velocity profile) so that we can control the motion in the gaps, which would require knowing the max velocity etc. so the axis would be a datastructure. This might make the kinematic code problematic so maybe the first 2 points are sufficient for this

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions