Dear Marvin,
Digging deep in the soil models, I found one oddity in the mironov model where you negate the imaginary part prior to assigning it to the complex permittivity. Having skimmed the Mironov papers (2004, 2013) I don't find a physical explanation why there should be a negative value. All the soil permittivites are always positive. See e.g. these interactive Ulaby plots. I'm not totally sure – let's have a discussion about that!
retvod::mironov l. 37$ eps <- complex(real = zepmx, imaginary = -1 * zepmy)
I would suggest
retvod::mironov l. 37$ eps <- complex(real = zepmx, imaginary = zepmy)
Best,
Konstantin
Dear Marvin,
Digging deep in the soil models, I found one oddity in the mironov model where you negate the imaginary part prior to assigning it to the complex permittivity. Having skimmed the Mironov papers (2004, 2013) I don't find a physical explanation why there should be a negative value. All the soil permittivites are always positive. See e.g. these interactive Ulaby plots. I'm not totally sure – let's have a discussion about that!
I would suggest
Best,
Konstantin