@@ -120,9 +120,8 @@ these using the limited a86 instruction set.
120120To do this , you should:
121121@itemlist[
122122@item{Study @tt{ast.rkt} to understand how these new forms of expression are represented.}
123-
124- @item{Study @tt{parse.rkt} and add support for parsing these
125- expressions. (See @secref[#:tag-prefixes '("a3- " )]{parse} for guidance.)}
123+
124+ @item{Add test cases to @tt{test/test-runner.rkt}.}
126125
127126@item{Update @tt{interp-prim.rkt} and @tt{interp.rkt} to correctly interpret these expressions.}
128127
@@ -131,7 +130,7 @@ to assembly.}
131130
132131@item{Update @tt{compile.rkt} to correctly compile these expressions.}
133132
134- @item{Check your implementation by running the tests in @tt{test/all.rkt }.}
133+ @item{Check your implementation by running the tests: @tt{raco test test/ }.}
135134]
136135
137136@section[#:tag-prefix "a3- " #:style 'unnumbered ]{Implementing cond }
@@ -143,6 +142,8 @@ To do this, you should:
143142@item{Study @tt{ast.rkt} to understand how these new forms of
144143expression are represented.}
145144
145+ @item{Add test cases to @tt{test/test-runner.rkt}.}
146+
146147@item{Update @tt{interp-prim.rkt} and @tt{interp.rkt} to correctly interpret @racket[cond ] expressions.}
147148
148149@item{Make examples of @racket[cond ]-expressions and potential translations of them
@@ -151,7 +152,7 @@ to assembly.}
151152@item{Update @tt{compile.rkt} to correctly compile @racket[cond ]
152153expressions based on your examples.}
153154
154- @item{Check your implementation by running the tests in @tt{test/all.rkt }.}
155+ @item{Check your implementation by running the tests: @tt{raco test tests/ }.}
155156]
156157
157158@section[#:tag-prefix "a3- " #:style 'unnumbered ]{Testing}
0 commit comments