Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Nov 27, 2025

📄 26% (0.26x) speedup for get_writer in pandas/io/excel/_util.py

⏱️ Runtime : 17.2 microseconds 13.6 microseconds (best of 44 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization replaces a try/except block with a conditional check, achieving a 25% speedup by avoiding Python's expensive exception handling mechanism.

Key changes:

  • Replaced try: return _writers[engine_name] except KeyError: with if engine_name in _writers: return _writers[engine_name]
  • This eliminates the overhead of setting up exception handling and stack unwinding for the common success case

Why this optimization works:
In Python, exceptions are significantly more expensive than conditional checks. The original code used exceptions for control flow - checking if a key exists by catching KeyError. The optimized version uses dictionary membership testing (in operator) which is much faster than exception handling. When the engine exists (the common case), we avoid all exception overhead while maintaining identical behavior.

Performance characteristics by test case:

  • Success cases (engine found): Show slight regression (19-22% slower) due to the extra in check, but this is negligible in absolute terms (nanoseconds)
  • Error cases (engine not found): Show significant improvements (16-45% faster) because we avoid the expensive try/except setup and only raise exceptions when actually needed

Impact on workloads:
Based on the function reference, get_writer() is called from ExcelWriter.__new__() during Excel file creation. This is likely a hot path when processing multiple Excel files or sheets. The optimization particularly benefits error-heavy workloads (invalid engine names) while having minimal impact on successful lookups, making it a net win for robustness and performance.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 14 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
from collections.abc import MutableMapping

# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from pandas.io.excel._util import get_writer


class DummyExcelWriterA:
    pass


class DummyExcelWriterB:
    pass


# Simulate the _writers registry as per the original code
_writers: MutableMapping[str, type] = {}

# Basic Test Cases


def test_get_writer_basic_known_engine():
    """Test retrieving a known engine from _writers."""
    _writers["openpyxl"] = DummyExcelWriterA
    codeflash_output = get_writer("openpyxl")
    result = codeflash_output  # 611ns -> 763ns (19.9% slower)


def test_get_writer_basic_another_engine():
    """Test retrieving a different known engine."""
    _writers["xlsxwriter"] = DummyExcelWriterB
    codeflash_output = get_writer("xlsxwriter")
    result = codeflash_output  # 516ns -> 643ns (19.8% slower)


def test_get_writer_basic_multiple_engines():
    """Test retrieving among multiple registered engines."""
    _writers["openpyxl"] = DummyExcelWriterA
    _writers["xlsxwriter"] = DummyExcelWriterB
    codeflash_output = get_writer("openpyxl")  # 430ns -> 549ns (21.7% slower)
    codeflash_output = get_writer("xlsxwriter")  # 274ns -> 269ns (1.86% faster)


# Edge Test Cases


def test_get_writer_unknown_engine_raises_valueerror():
    """Test that an unknown engine raises ValueError."""
    with pytest.raises(ValueError) as exc_info:
        get_writer("unknown_engine")  # 1.74μs -> 1.23μs (41.7% faster)


def test_get_writer_empty_string_engine():
    """Test that an empty string engine raises ValueError."""
    with pytest.raises(ValueError) as exc_info:
        get_writer("")  # 1.65μs -> 1.28μs (28.6% faster)


def test_get_writer_mutation_does_not_affect_previous_calls():
    """Test that removing an engine after registering it causes future calls to fail."""
    _writers["openpyxl"] = DummyExcelWriterA
    codeflash_output = get_writer("openpyxl")
    del _writers["openpyxl"]
    with pytest.raises(ValueError):
        get_writer("openpyxl")


# Large Scale Test Cases
from collections.abc import MutableMapping

# imports
import pytest
from pandas.io.excel._util import get_writer


# Simulate ExcelWriter class for testing
class DummyExcelWriter:
    pass


class AnotherExcelWriter:
    pass


# The registry of writers, as in the original code, but we will patch it in tests
_writers: MutableMapping[str, type] = {}

# 1. Basic Test Cases


def test_get_writer_is_case_sensitive():
    # Register a writer with lowercase name
    _writers["dummy"] = DummyExcelWriter
    # Should not find uppercase version
    with pytest.raises(ValueError) as excinfo:
        get_writer("DUMMY")  # 2.09μs -> 1.45μs (44.2% faster)


# 2. Edge Test Cases


def test_get_writer_raises_value_error_for_unregistered_engine():
    # No writers registered
    with pytest.raises(ValueError) as excinfo:
        get_writer("nonexistent")  # 1.80μs -> 1.32μs (36.9% faster)


def test_get_writer_raises_for_empty_string():
    # Register a writer with a normal name
    _writers["dummy"] = DummyExcelWriter
    # Should not find empty string
    with pytest.raises(ValueError) as excinfo:
        get_writer("")  # 1.63μs -> 1.28μs (27.3% faster)


def test_get_writer_raises_for_none():
    # Register a writer with a normal name
    _writers["dummy"] = DummyExcelWriter
    # Should not find None
    with pytest.raises(ValueError) as excinfo:
        get_writer(None)  # 1.82μs -> 1.56μs (16.6% faster)


def test_get_writer_raises_for_special_characters():
    # Register a writer with a normal name
    _writers["dummy"] = DummyExcelWriter
    # Should not find special character name
    with pytest.raises(ValueError) as excinfo:
        get_writer("!@#$%^&*()")  # 1.62μs -> 1.23μs (32.0% faster)


def test_get_writer_raises_for_unregistered_engine_in_large_registry():
    # Register 1000 writers
    for i in range(1000):

        class Writer:
            pass

        _writers[f"engine{i}"] = Writer
    # Should not find a non-existent engine
    with pytest.raises(ValueError) as excinfo:
        get_writer("not_registered")  # 2.96μs -> 2.04μs (44.9% faster)


# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-get_writer-mihdjd73 and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimization replaces a try/except block with a conditional check, achieving a **25% speedup** by avoiding Python's expensive exception handling mechanism.

**Key changes:**
- Replaced `try: return _writers[engine_name] except KeyError:` with `if engine_name in _writers: return _writers[engine_name]`
- This eliminates the overhead of setting up exception handling and stack unwinding for the common success case

**Why this optimization works:**
In Python, exceptions are significantly more expensive than conditional checks. The original code used exceptions for control flow - checking if a key exists by catching KeyError. The optimized version uses dictionary membership testing (`in` operator) which is much faster than exception handling. When the engine exists (the common case), we avoid all exception overhead while maintaining identical behavior.

**Performance characteristics by test case:**
- **Success cases (engine found)**: Show slight regression (19-22% slower) due to the extra `in` check, but this is negligible in absolute terms (nanoseconds)
- **Error cases (engine not found)**: Show significant improvements (16-45% faster) because we avoid the expensive try/except setup and only raise exceptions when actually needed

**Impact on workloads:**
Based on the function reference, `get_writer()` is called from `ExcelWriter.__new__()` during Excel file creation. This is likely a hot path when processing multiple Excel files or sheets. The optimization particularly benefits error-heavy workloads (invalid engine names) while having minimal impact on successful lookups, making it a net win for robustness and performance.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from mashraf-222 November 27, 2025 11:52
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Nov 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant