Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Nov 28, 2025

📄 64% (0.64x) speedup for IndexVariable.to_index in xarray/core/variable.py

⏱️ Runtime : 2.26 milliseconds 1.38 milliseconds (best of 5 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimized code achieves a 64% speedup by reducing unnecessary object creation in pandas Index operations, which are notoriously expensive in Python.

Key Optimizations:

  1. Conditional MultiIndex name setting: The original code always created new level names for MultiIndex objects, even when all names were already valid. The optimization only calls set_names() when at least one name is None, avoiding expensive MultiIndex reconstruction when no changes are needed.

  2. Conditional Index name setting: For regular Index objects, the optimization compares the current name with the desired name before calling set_names(). Since pandas Index objects are immutable, set_names() creates a new Index instance even when the name doesn't change. By skipping this when current_name == name, we eliminate unnecessary object creation.

Why This Matters:

Pandas Index operations involve significant overhead due to immutability guarantees and internal validation. Each set_names() call creates a new Index object with complete metadata copying. In xarray's coordinate system, IndexVariable objects are frequently created during dataset operations, making these micro-optimizations compound significantly.

The optimizations are particularly effective for workloads with:

  • Datasets with many coordinate variables that already have proper names
  • MultiIndex coordinates where level names are pre-defined
  • Repeated index operations during data alignment and merging

These changes maintain full backward compatibility while reducing computational overhead in the common case where index names are already correctly set.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 210 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 2 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 255 Passed
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 80.0%
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
test_variable.py::TestIndexVariable.test_multiindex_default_level_names 26.3μs 27.5μs -4.07%⚠️
test_variable.py::TestIndexVariable.test_to_index 13.1μs 13.5μs -2.96%⚠️
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

# imports
import pytest
from xarray.core.variable import IndexVariable

# function to test: IndexVariable.to_index
# (see code provided in the prompt above)

# Basic Test Cases


def test_to_index_raises_on_ndim_not_1():
    # Test that IndexVariable only accepts 1D data
    arr = np.array([[1, 2], [3, 4]])
    with pytest.raises(ValueError):
        IndexVariable(("x", "y"), arr)
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

# imports
import pytest
from xarray.core.variable import IndexVariable


# function to test (minimal, isolated implementation for testing)
class PandasIndexingAdapter:
    """Minimal adapter for testing; wraps a pandas.Index or array-like."""

    def __init__(self, array):
        if isinstance(array, pd.Index):
            self.array = array
        else:
            self.array = pd.Index(array)
        self.level = None  # Used for MultiIndex level selection


# unit tests

# ------------------ BASIC TEST CASES ------------------


def test_invalid_ndim_raises():
    # Should raise for non-1D
    with pytest.raises(ValueError):
        IndexVariable(("x", "y"), [[1, 2], [3, 4]])


# ------------------ LARGE SCALE TEST CASES ------------------
⏪ Replay Tests and Runtime
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
test_pytest_xarrayteststest_concat_py_xarrayteststest_computation_py_xarrayteststest_formatting_py_xarray__replay_test_0.py::test_xarray_core_variable_IndexVariable_to_index 1.67ms 1.01ms 64.1%✅

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-IndexVariable.to_index-miiwx3kl and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimized code achieves a **64% speedup** by reducing unnecessary object creation in pandas Index operations, which are notoriously expensive in Python.

**Key Optimizations:**

1. **Conditional MultiIndex name setting**: The original code always created new level names for MultiIndex objects, even when all names were already valid. The optimization only calls `set_names()` when at least one name is `None`, avoiding expensive MultiIndex reconstruction when no changes are needed.

2. **Conditional Index name setting**: For regular Index objects, the optimization compares the current name with the desired name before calling `set_names()`. Since pandas Index objects are immutable, `set_names()` creates a new Index instance even when the name doesn't change. By skipping this when `current_name == name`, we eliminate unnecessary object creation.

**Why This Matters:**

Pandas Index operations involve significant overhead due to immutability guarantees and internal validation. Each `set_names()` call creates a new Index object with complete metadata copying. In xarray's coordinate system, `IndexVariable` objects are frequently created during dataset operations, making these micro-optimizations compound significantly.

The optimizations are particularly effective for workloads with:
- Datasets with many coordinate variables that already have proper names
- MultiIndex coordinates where level names are pre-defined
- Repeated index operations during data alignment and merging

These changes maintain full backward compatibility while reducing computational overhead in the common case where index names are already correctly set.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from mashraf-222 November 28, 2025 13:43
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Nov 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant