-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
Slirp: Remove for Podman6 #27338
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Slirp: Remove for Podman6 #27338
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: lsm5 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
3f540c7 to
846a13c
Compare
846a13c to
218b398
Compare
|
[NON-BLOCKING] Packit jobs failed. @containers/packit-build please check. Everyone else, feel free to ignore. |
1 similar comment
|
[NON-BLOCKING] Packit jobs failed. @containers/packit-build please check. Everyone else, feel free to ignore. |
583764c to
d7744ec
Compare
|
Yeah, that sounds like a genuine problem on the podman side: |
d7744ec to
a55c778
Compare
a55c778 to
f36cb63
Compare
podman-next copr repo packages have a much higher Epoch than packit copr packages, We should exclude the former from the testing environment as we intend to test the latter. Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
TMT_TREE envvar is ok to use in this case as it will only be used on upstream packit tests. Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Will log and proceed on non-linux env. Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
f36cb63 to
2e7738c
Compare
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@redhat.com>
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?