Missing output dependency information implies that output depends on all other scalar variables, is that intensional?

[lausdahl]

The model description which is exported will contain outputs in this format:

<ModelStructure>
        <Outputs>
            <Unknown index="45" />
            <Unknown index="48" />
        </Outputs>
    </ModelStructure>

this implies that index 45 and 48 must be of type output which they are but also that they depend on all other scalar variables defined in the model. The FMI standard refers to this as the worst case type of dependency. This is assumes if no dependency information is available.

Either the dependencies should be listed as dependencies="1 2 3" for dependency on 1, 2 and 3 where the dependenciesKind can be used to detail the type of dependency.

Otherwise dependencies="" can be used to indicate no dependencies.

See p. 61 in https://svn.modelica.org/fmi/branches/public/specifications/v2.0/FMI_for_ModelExchange_and_CoSimulation_v2.0.pdf

[margro]

Yes it is intentional, since we don't yet have the dependency information available during our code generation process.
This means that I cannot generate the dependencies="1 2 3" list right now.
I've created a 20-sim enhancement ticket for the code generation to export the dependency information such that we can generate the actual dependencies list.