Skip to content

Conversation

@sgrekhov
Copy link
Contributor

@sgrekhov sgrekhov commented Dec 1, 2025

No description provided.

@sgrekhov sgrekhov requested a review from eernstg December 1, 2025 16:06
Copy link
Member

@eernstg eernstg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, with a couple of typos.

/// before it in the augmentation chain is also complete.
///
/// @description Checks that it is a compile-time error to add a body to already
/// completed top level function.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think 'complete' is better than 'completed' (we haven't defined what it means to be a 'completed function', but 'complete declaration' including 'complete function' is well-defined).

Suggested change
/// completed top level function.
/// complete top level function.

A few other places use the same terminology.

/// It's a compile-time error if an augmentation is complete and any declaration
/// before it in the augmentation chain is also complete.
///
/// @description Checks that it is a compile-time error to add a body to already
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo:

Suggested change
/// @description Checks that it is a compile-time error to add a body to already
/// @description Checks that it is a compile-time error to add a body to an already

A few other locations have the same issue.

@sgrekhov
Copy link
Contributor Author

sgrekhov commented Dec 2, 2025

Thank you! Fixed.

@sgrekhov sgrekhov requested a review from eernstg December 2, 2025 09:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants