Using python package "lbg" instead of dpcloudserver will make the program easier to maintain #305
                  
                    
                      xiaoyeqiannian
                    
                  
                
                  started this conversation in
                General
              
            Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
| 
         It looks good to me.  | 
  
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
                  
                    0 replies
                  
                
            -
| 
         Do you think it's a better idea to implement a plugin of   | 
  
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
                  
                    3 replies
                  
                
            
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
        
    
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
"lbgcore" has been well encapsulated in the python library "lbg". We can replace the work of dpcloudserver in dpdispatcher by "import lbgcore". In the future, the new featcher and bug fixes of "lbg" will be updated to dpdispatcher in a more timely manner, what’s your opinion? @njzjz
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions