Skip to content

Commit dd2cfab

Browse files
diamante0018philnik777
authored andcommitted
[libc++] add test for latch ctor
Currently, there are no tests to confirm without a doubt the constructor of latch is really constexpr and explicit. I think this would be an addition that it would not harm to have. In another revision, I was asked to add tests for an almost identical case which made me consider adding this test for the latch class too. Reviewed By: #libc, philnik Spies: philnik, libcxx-commits, kristof.beyls Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D154957
1 parent c77af00 commit dd2cfab

File tree

1 file changed

+35
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+35
-0
lines changed
Lines changed: 35 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
1+
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
2+
//
3+
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
4+
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
5+
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
6+
//
7+
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
8+
//
9+
// UNSUPPORTED: no-threads
10+
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11
11+
12+
// <latch>
13+
14+
// inline constexpr explicit latch(ptrdiff_t __expected);
15+
16+
// Make sure that the ctor of latch is constexpr and explicit.
17+
18+
#include <latch>
19+
20+
#include "test_convertible.h"
21+
22+
static_assert(!test_convertible<std::latch, std::ptrdiff_t>(), "This constructor must be explicit");
23+
24+
constexpr bool test() {
25+
std::latch l(5);
26+
(void)l;
27+
return true;
28+
}
29+
30+
int main(int, char**) {
31+
test();
32+
static_assert(test(), "");
33+
34+
return 0;
35+
}

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)