Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Hmmm... Possibly a question for a lawyer to answer, but you could probably ask Google. They may not mind, especially as the wake words would be just examples. The thing with all that sort of stuff, in general, is to ensure proper attribution of ownership of the technology in any documentation. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello everyone, I created a fairly simple app using openWakeWord and plan to share it using the Apache 2.0 license. The repo is still private, and before I release it, I was wondering whether there are any licensing issues if I include some sample wake word
.onnxfiles during the release, particularly those created with the Training New Models guide (mainly this and this). Any advice would be great!Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions