From 5654897c83bfab909c92f46ae7418648b5075830 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Wolf Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 14:07:43 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Abandon RFC 0051 This RFC won't be worked on right now, so it's moved to stage X. --- rfcs/text/0051-user-is-privileged.md | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/rfcs/text/0051-user-is-privileged.md b/rfcs/text/0051-user-is-privileged.md index 43923a97a..9c6d930c8 100644 --- a/rfcs/text/0051-user-is-privileged.md +++ b/rfcs/text/0051-user-is-privileged.md @@ -1,10 +1,15 @@ # 0051: Add user.is_privileged boolean field -- Stage: **0 (strawperson)** -- Date: **2025-07-28** +- Stage: **X (abandoned)** +- Date: **2025-08-11** This RFC proposes adding a new boolean field, `user.is_privileged`. It will explicitly flag when a user has elevated or administrative rights such as ability to grant permissions, perform `sudo`, or manage IAM roles—so analysts can more easily filter, alert on, and correlate privileged‐user activity without custom parsing. +## Stage X + +This RFC is not being worked on actively, and it has been marked as abandoned. If an individual wishes to advance it in the future, open a new pull request against this proposal. + + ## Fields ```yaml