Currently we just use `Vec<u8>` in both cases which is just wrong. These are two distinct types and this should be reflected in the code. For example [here](https://github.com/equilibriumco/pathfinder/blob/4026bf05240d088bc19f539524525dd02b3215f0/crates/common/src/l2.rs#L86), and in many other places in the code as well.
Currently we just use
Vec<u8>in both cases which is just wrong. These are two distinct types and this should be reflected in the code.For example here, and in many other places in the code as well.