[Node Operator Question] <Block height is not increasing> #237
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hey @AmardeepSambaru, can you please try restarting your |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Are you running the most up to date node software?
Did you check the documentation?
Did you check for duplicate questions?
Issue Description
I am running the optimism archive node. Two days back i updated the Binary of op-node and op-geth with latest Version.
After i updated the binary the Block height is not increasing and see the below logs.
Can anyone Help me.
Thanks you
Protocol Description
op-geth version v1.101305.3
op-node version v1.5.0
network: mainnet
Node Logs
op-node logs:
Feb 05 10:27:02 fond-dingo op-node[3183045]: t=2024-02-05T10:27:02+0000 lvl=warn msg="Derivation process temporary error" attempts=265 err="temp: failed to fetch receipts of L1 block 0xbd8382f5be9e72fbd155da19fc5b919b6e337704a659cb3ab8c0149ae90f9815:17882072 (parent: 0xaf5c355c122ad7340e250249f845fb3d4a35410651948f6ef4e0e6b97b7d5ef4:17882071) for L1 sysCfg update: invalid receipts: log 24 of tx 0x5bb32ce62644d3aa22ef15f2d5bcb14c7c6dc51c118219315a0189015f23aaa8 has unexpected tx hash 0xf220c1329c1ae58d73454201ebb981c11c507bbefab7578e8dcecd534eafa40e"
Feb 05 10:27:03 fond-dingo op-node[3183045]: t=2024-02-05T10:27:03+0000 lvl=info msg="Received signed execution payload from p2p" id=0xe2b2843a2c9557835f84aad6859853b5d53332c0615c8e832e0b92b85c9e1167:115765023 peer=16Uiu2HAm7dgsqx3gtF9LKWgp5KzHRMLkRrxDaJi9t6B6yz8jxRtu
Feb 05 10:27:03 fond-dingo op-node[3183045]: t=2024-02-05T10:27:03+0000 lvl=info msg="Optimistically queueing unsafe L2 execution payload" id=0xe2b2843a2c9557835f84aad6859853b5d53332c0615c8e832e0b92b85c9e1167:115765023
Feb 05 10:27:05 fond-dingo op-node[3183045]: t=2024-02-05T10:27:05+0000 lvl=info msg="Received signed execution payload from p2p" id=0x2d21c8676d3e388e1aeb1ae8865d291f5c1e2a64bd9a76b9c056b599201b9118:115765024 peer=16Uiu2HAmGQeaBiD9gEV6bc89hnC37Q9WnVPzSNCK6Msd6v8Hj1xm
Feb 05 10:27:05 fond-dingo op-node[3183045]: t=2024-02-05T10:27:05+0000 lvl=info msg="Optimistically queueing unsafe L2 execution payload" id=0x2d21c8676d3e388e1aeb1ae8865d291f5c1e2a64bd9a76b9c056b599201b9118:115765024
Feb 05 10:27:07 fond-dingo op-node[3183045]: t=2024-02-05T10:27:07+0000 lvl=info msg="Received signed execution payload from p2p" id=0xb59d834b0337ef49369c66d8872bb4c7951160fb596395ddb5f3a4722a210a01:115765025 peer=16Uiu2HAmGQeaBiD9gEV6bc89hnC37Q9WnVPzSNCK6Msd6v8Hj1xm
Feb 05 10:27:07 fond-dingo op-node[3183045]: t=2024-02-05T10:27:07+0000 lvl=info msg="Optimistically queueing unsafe L2 execution payload" id=0xb59d834b0337ef49369c66d8872bb4c7951160fb596395ddb5f3a4722a210a01:115765025
Feb 05 10:27:09 fond-dingo op-node[3183045]: t=2024-02-05T10:27:09+0000 lvl=info msg="Received signed execution payload from p2p" id=0x511222c2736f572ddfe4478b57602b5fa56335a92566c3829a80a95d2d24c268:115765026 peer=16Uiu2HAm7dgsqx3gtF9LKWgp5KzHRMLkRrxDaJi9t6B6yz8jxRtu
Feb 05 10:27:09 fond-dingo op-node[3183045]: t=2024-02-05T10:27:09+0000 lvl=info msg="Optimistically queueing unsafe L2 execution payload" id=0x511222c2736f572ddfe4478b57602b5fa56335a92566c3829a80a95d2d24c268:115765026
Feb 05 10:27:11 fond-dingo op-node[3183045]: t=2024-02-05T10:27:11+0000 lvl=info msg="Received signed execution payload from p2p" id=0x6ae911ae4d2a1c265d1fb441d9ed0ae3e596c4cd260eb77c65465cabb878223c:115765027 peer=16Uiu2HAmGQeaBiD9gEV6bc89hnC37Q9WnVPzSNCK6Msd6v8Hj1xm
Feb 05 10:27:11 fond-dingo op-node[3183045]: t=2024-02-05T10:27:11+0000 lvl=info msg="Optimistically queueing unsafe L2 execution payload" id=0x6ae911ae4d2a1c265d1fb441d9ed0ae3e596c4cd260eb77c65465cabb878223c:115765027
Feb 05 10:27:12 fond-dingo op-node[3183045]: t=2024-02-05T10:27:12+0000 lvl=warn msg="Derivation process temporary error" attempts=266 err="temp: failed to fetch receipts of L1 block 0xbd8382f5be9e72fbd155da19fc5b919b6e337704a659cb3ab8c0149ae90f9815:17882072 (parent: 0xaf5c355c122ad7340e250249f845fb3d4a35410651948f6ef4e0e6b97b7d5ef4:17882071) for L1 sysCfg update: invalid receipts: log 24 of tx 0x5bb32ce62644d3aa22ef15f2d5bcb14c7c6dc51c118219315a0189015f23aaa8 has unexpected tx hash 0xf220c1329c1ae58d73454201ebb981c11c507bbefab7578e8dcecd534eafa40e"
op-geth logs:
Feb 06 21:29:32 fond-dingo geth[3321449]: INFO [02-06|21:29:32.738] Regenerated local transaction journal transactions=0 accounts=0
Feb 06 22:29:32 fond-dingo geth[3321449]: INFO [02-06|22:29:32.738] Regenerated local transaction journal transactions=0 accounts=0
Feb 06 23:29:32 fond-dingo geth[3321449]: INFO [02-06|23:29:32.738] Regenerated local transaction journal transactions=0 accounts=0
Feb 07 00:29:32 fond-dingo geth[3321449]: INFO [02-07|00:29:32.738] Regenerated local transaction journal transactions=0 accounts=0
Feb 07 01:29:32 fond-dingo geth[3321449]: INFO [02-07|01:29:32.738] Regenerated local transaction journal transactions=0 accounts=0
Feb 07 02:29:32 fond-dingo geth[3321449]: INFO [02-07|02:29:32.738] Regenerated local transaction journal transactions=0 accounts=0
Feb 07 03:29:32 fond-dingo geth[3321449]: INFO [02-07|03:29:32.738] Regenerated local transaction journal transactions=0 accounts=0
Additional Information
No response
Feedback
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions