From cef913ee45f00dc347533e4847073a8808c2a599 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Buck Evan Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:06:37 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] rfc(informational): RBAC at Sentry --- README.md | 1 + text/0066-rbac-at-sentry.md | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+) create mode 100644 text/0066-rbac-at-sentry.md diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 7e56336b..ba0058ce 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -28,3 +28,4 @@ This repository contains RFCs and DACIs. Lost? - [0047-introduce-profile-context](text/0047-introduce-profile-context.md): Add Profile Context - [0048-move-replayid-out-of-tags](text/0048-move-replayid-out-of-tags.md): Plan to replace freight with GoCD * [0043-instruction-addr-adjustment](text/0043-instruction-addr-adjustment.md): new StackTrace Protocol field that controls adjustment of the `instruction_addr` for symbolication +- [0066-rbac-at-sentry](text/0066-rbac-at-sentry.md): RBAC at Sentry diff --git a/text/0066-rbac-at-sentry.md b/text/0066-rbac-at-sentry.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..7f1c55fb --- /dev/null +++ b/text/0066-rbac-at-sentry.md @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +- Start Date: 2023-01-23 +- RFC Type: informational +- RFC PR: https://github.com/getsentry/rfcs/pull/66 +- RFC Status: draft + +# Summary + +One paragraph explanation of the feature or document purpose. + +# Motivation + +Why are we doing this? What use cases does it support? What is the expected outcome? + +# Background + +The reason this decision or document is required. This section might not always exist. + +# Supporting Data + +[Metrics to help support your decision (if applicable).] + +# Options Considered + +If an RFC does not know yet what the options are, it can propose multiple options. The +preferred model is to propose one option and to provide alternatives. + +# Drawbacks + +Why should we not do this? What are the drawbacks of this RFC or a particular option if +multiple options are presented. + +# Unresolved questions + +- What parts of the design do you expect to resolve through this RFC? +- What issues are out of scope for this RFC but are known?