It should be a pairwise combination:
M1CA-M1HA 55.12 4.55
M1CE-M1HE 17.25 1.72
Q2CA-Q2HA 54.9 5.27
I3CA-I3HA 59.5 4.21
I3CB-I3HB 42.4 1.77
I3CG2-I3HG2 18.1 0.66
I3CD1-I3HD1 14.3 0.61
Whilst now its doing an all-vs-all combination
S1C-S1H 172.29 8.44
S1C-S1HB2 172.29 3.87
S1C-S1HB3 172.29 3.90
S1CA-S1H 57.16 8.44
S1CA-S1HB2 57.16 3.87
S1CA-S1HB3 57.16 3.90
S1CB-S1H 63.03 8.44
This is implied by the atom notation of CX-HX, we then need a new definition in the catalog for this type of combination.
It should be a pairwise combination:
Whilst now its doing an all-vs-all combination
This is implied by the atom notation of
CX-HX, we then need a new definition in the catalog for this type of combination.