From 42f8c06fef8db833e3e08530eaf4edac8adfc03e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Clinton's MiniPC <achuworifung@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 21:51:01 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] format the html

---
 index.html | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
index be6fbcb..9bb1df6 100755
--- a/index.html
+++ b/index.html
@@ -1,16 +1,21 @@
-SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
+<h1>SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES</h1>
 
-Brown v. Board of Education
-347 U.S. 483 (1954) (USSC+)
+<h3> Brown v. Board of Education</h3>
+<h3>347 U.S. 483 (1954) (USSC+)</h3>
 
-Argued December 9, 1952
+<p>Argued December 9, 1952
 Reargued December 8, 1953
-Decided May 17, 1954
+Decided May 17, 1954</p>
 
-APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS*
+<h2>APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS*</h2>
 
-[PHOTO]
-Integration at Ole Miss Univ. MST 10/9/62. Photo by Warren K. Leffler (link)
+<img Src = "./integrated_classroom.jpg" alt = "Integrated Classroom" width = "400" height = "300">
+<p>
+
+    Integration at Ole Miss Univ. MST 10/9/62. Photo by Warren K. Leffler (link)
+</p>
+
+<pre> 
 
 Syllabus
 
@@ -28,7 +33,7 @@
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court.
 
 These cases come to us from the States of Kansas, South Carolina, Virginia, and Delaware. They are premised on different facts and different local conditions, but a common legal question justifies their consideration together in this consolidated opinion.
-
+    
 In each of the cases, minors of the Negro race, through their legal representatives, seek the aid of the courts in obtaining admission to the public schools of their community on a nonsegregated basis. In each instance, they had been denied admission to schools attended by white children under laws requiring or permitting segregation according to race. This segregation was alleged to deprive the plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment. In each of the cases other than the Delaware case, a three-judge federal district court denied relief to the plaintiffs on the so-called "separate but equal" doctrine announced by this Court in Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537. Under that doctrine, equality of treatment is accorded when the races are provided substantially equal facilities, even though these facilities be separate. In the Delaware case, the Supreme Court of Delaware adhered to that doctrine, but ordered that the plaintiffs be admitted to the white schools because of their superiority to the Negro schools.
 
 The plaintiffs contend that segregated public schools are not "equal" and cannot be made "equal," and that hence they are deprived of the equal protection of the laws. Because of the obvious importance of the question presented, the Court took jurisdiction. Argument was heard in the 1952 Term, and reargument was heard this Term on certain questions propounded by the Court.
@@ -80,3 +85,5 @@
 Robert H. Jackson (1941-1954)
 Harold H. Burton (1945-1958)
 Sherman Minton (1949-1956)
+
+</pre>
\ No newline at end of file