[bug]: Why port resolution is not there for tcp6? and why processes' ID are not displayed?

[Phil353556]

Description

Hello,
On Raspberry Pi 4 Model B Rev 1.4
under Raspbian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) aarch64
with 8Go of memory

I use snitch since a few days, really great software, make visible what is invisible!
-no process ID displayed,
-protocols are not always displayed

see screenshot

regards

Steps to Reproduce

just run snitch

Expected Behavior

-processes ID displayed
-protocols displayed at least for some (see screenshot)

Actual Behavior

No response

Version

v0.2.2

Operating System

Linux

OS Version

Raspbian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)

Installation Method

Install script

Configuration

Logs / Terminal Output

Additional Context

No response

[jsnfwlr]

I have submitted a patch that partially resolves this issue. It expands the list of ports that can be named and ensures that tcp6 and udp6 ports are named the same way the tcp and udp ports are, respectively.

It does not resolve the missing process value.

[jsnfwlr]

FYI @Phil353556 the lack of process name is a user-permissions issue - I've noticed the same problem with witr --port 22 (https://github.com/pranshuparmar/witr) which I was able to resolve by running sudo witr --port 22

So, if you run snitch as root (sudo snitch) you get the process names.

[Phil353556]

Hello,
I apologize, you're right, and I didn't even think to try with user root,
Can I suggest displaying a message at launch?

About the line with no process name, I think the name is apache too.
snitch shows me all connexions waiting for a SYN+ACK, (scan from internet)

Phil [ a fan of snitch ! ]